Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Holmstrom v. University of Tulsa
as 4:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
Eyan Holmstrom
Defendant:
University of Tulsa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5054
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Mahadevan v. Kelkar et al
as 4:2021cv00053
Defendant:
Mohan Kelkar, Winona Tanaka, University of Tulsa and others
Plaintiff:
Jagan Mahadevan
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Barnett v. Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C. et al
as 4:2018cv00064
Plaintiff:
Christopher Barnett
Defendant:
Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C. , J Patrick Cremin , Johnathan L Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gobert v. The University of Tulsa et al
as 1:2017cv04979
Plaintiff:
Donald Gobert
Defendant:
The University of Tulsa, Conference USA and National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gobert v. The University of Tulsa et al
as TXE/9:17-cv-00106
Plaintiff:
Donald Gobert
Defendant:
The University of Tulsa , Conference USA and National Collegiate Athletic Association
Gobert v. The University of Tulsa et al
as 9:2017cv00106
Plaintiff:
Donald Gobert
Defendant:
The University of Tulsa, Conference USA and National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cruz et al v. Johnson Matthey Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00268
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Cruz , Scott Bender , Konark Ogra and others
Defendant:
Johnson Matthey Inc. , University of Tulsa, The , Chevron Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-5053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
