Cases 11 - 20 of 1,451
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00862
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00863
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meadows et al v. Haws et al
as 2:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
Veronica Ruiz Meadows and GrandMaster G-Man Meadows
Defendant:
David Haws, Barry L Olsen, Estate of Darrell Davis/Jodi McCallister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Carrillo v. Kohl's et al
as 2:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Kohl's, Maria Carrillo, Christopher Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carrillo v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Unknown Party, Pam Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Bailey v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
John Bailey
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Barry Roska and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
