Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Hurley v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv00831
Plaintiff:
Jamie R Hurley
Defendant:
A Jones, Danly, Upton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Upton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
William B Upton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
CLERVRAIN et al v. DIMON et al
as 1:2021cv02918
Plaintiff:
MANETIONY CLERVRAIN, BRANDAKO, INC and ASHELEY CARMELLE DORSAINVILLE
Defendant:
JAMIE DIMON, ASHLEY BACON, LORI A. BEER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Upton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00324
Plaintiff:
William B Upton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Upton v. Marcus et al
as 2:2021cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jermell Upton
Defendant:
Troy Design & Manufacturing Co., Inc. and Thomas Marcus, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Upton v. Marcus et al
as 2:2021cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jermell Upton
Defendant:
Troy Design & Manufacturing Co., Inc. and Thomas Marcus, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROCK et al v. PAGEL et al
as 1:2019cv04882
Defendant:
MARLEY MOSLEY, BLAKE PAGEL and MATTHEW FOLEY
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ROCK and DANIELLE UPTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UPTON v. TOWN OF CLARKSVILLE, INDIANA
as 4:2016cv00229
Defendant:
TOWN OF CLARKSVILLE, INDIANA
Plaintiff:
MARY HAZEL UPTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
UPTON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv00601
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. UPTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
