Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Washington v. VA. D.O.C.
as 7:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Darrell Washington, II
Defendant:
VA. D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levi Springer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Defendant / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON, VA D.O.C. Director, RANDALL C. MATHENA, VA D.O.C. Security Operations Manager, H. SCOTT RICHESON, Deputy Dir., VA D.O.C. and others
Maxey v. New Kent Circuit Court et al
as 1:2023cv01389
Petitioner:
Robert S. Maxey, Jr.
Respondent:
New Kent Circuit Court and VA D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Springer v. Clarke et al
as 1:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Randall C. Mathena, H. Scott Richeson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Troy Minter v. Harold Clarke
as 22-7121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TROY XAVIER MINTER
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Operations, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA D.O.C., JAMES M. SISK and others
Shearin v. Chief Medical Director of VA D.O.C. et al
as 2:2021cv00392
Plaintiff:
Charles McCoy Shearin
Defendant:
Chief Medical Director of VA D.O.C., Chief Physician of VA D.O.C., Dr. Militana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Tippens, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6729
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA D.O.C.
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT EARL TIPPENS, JR.
Tippens v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2019cv00369
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Tippens, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark Herring, Cortez Hernandas, VA D.O.C and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobby Nicholson, Jr. v. V.A.D.O.C.
as 19-6516
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOBBY MAURICE NICHOLSON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
VA. D.O.C., Pass Unite
Robert E. Tippens, Jr. v. Harold W. Clarke
as 17-7636
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT EARL TIPPENS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA D.O.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
