Cases 1 - 8 of 8
IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS' EXECUTION PROTOCOL CASES
as 1:2019mc00145
Defendant:
CHADRICK EVAN FULKS, PAUL LAIRD, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
ALFRED BOURGEOIS, JULIUS ROBINSON, JAMES H. ROANE, JR., and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BRUCE WEBSTER, ANTHONY BATTLE and ORLANDO HALL
Intervenor Defendant:
RICHARD VEACH
Intervenor:
JEFFREY PAUL
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS' EXECUTION PROTOCOL CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MCINTOSH v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2008cv01506
Plaintiff:
CARL MCINTOSH
Defendant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, ALBERTO R. GONZALES, MICHAEL MUKASEY and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ROBINSON v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2007cv02145
Plaintiff:
JULIUS ROBINSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, KAREN TANDY, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
NEFF v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2007cv01672
Plaintiff:
MARK L. NEFF
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, RICHARD CARROLL, DANIEL L. KNAPPMEYER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
HILL v. VEACH et al
as 1:2007cv01137
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Respondent:
RICK V. VEACH and KENNETH L. WAINSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HILL v. VEACH
as 1:2007cv00886
Respondent:
RICK V. VEACH
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HILL v. VEACH
as 1:2007cv00518
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Respondent:
RICK V. VEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
METCALF v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2007cv00206
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD METCALF
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, MICHAEL ATWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
