Cases 1 - 10 of 25
United States of America v. Real Property and Improvements Located at 2221 Venable Street, Richmond, VA 23223
as 3:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property and Improvements Located at 2221 Venable Street, Richmond, VA 23223
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Venable v. Supreme Court of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Demetric Markie Venable
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Virginia, Honorable S. Bernard Goodwyn, Honorable D. Arthur Kelsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Venable v. Dunlevy et al
as 3:2022cv00661
Plaintiff:
Demetric Venable
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Dunlevy and Tony M. Darden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Venable v. Shabazz et al
as 1:2022cv00462
Plaintiff:
Corey Cam Venable
Defendant:
Major Shabazz, Captain Degeare, 1st Lieutenant Quesenberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Venable v. Bucklen
as 7:2019cv00606
Defendant:
A. Bucklen
Plaintiff:
Julian H. Venable, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Venable v. Bucklen
as 1:2019cv01130
Defendant:
A. Bucklen
Plaintiff:
Julian H. Venable, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Venable v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv00458
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lynn Venable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cephas et al v. City of Richmond, Virginia
as 3:2015cv00332
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Cephas , Jamie Albert , Solange Cole and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Eggleston v. Venable et al
as 2:2012cv00704
Plaintiff:
Vernon Eggleston
Defendant:
Richard Venable, Anthony Burnett and Cpl. West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
