Cases 1 - 10 of 11
OWENS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv05165
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN OWENS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCH CARNEY, LACOMBE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AUTRY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv01501
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY AUTRY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRISON COMMISSIONER BLANCHE CARNEY, WARDEN PIERRE LACOMBE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: BERWYN STONE
as 2:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
BERWYN STONE
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA DEPT. OF PRISONS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATERMAN v. NEOGEN CORP. et al
as 2:2022cv01251
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
NEOGEN CORP., JAMES C BOREL, WILLIAM T BOEHM and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
OWENS v. JANE DOE et al
as 2:2021cv02402
Defendant:
JANE DOE, MCRAVION, GREENVILLE SOCIAL WORKER 1 and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORDON v. ROSS et al
as 2:2016cv01120
Plaintiff:
ADAM GORDON
Defendant:
ROSS, JUBILEE, KOFA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VETTER v. BROCK et al
as 2:2015cv01715
Plaintiff:
PATRICK VETTER
Defendant:
SHARON BROCK, MICHAEL VETTER, JR., MICHAEL VETTER, SR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VETTER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv41626
Plaintiff:
DENNIS D. VETTER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
VETTER v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv34425
Plaintiff:
DENNIS D. VETTER
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
VETTER v. ANCHOR PACKING CO et al
as 2:2009cv61182
Plaintiff:
JEROME M. VETTER
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING CO, ANCHOR PACKING CO, ANCHOR PACKING CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
