Cases 1 - 10 of 31
In re: Subpoena to Keisha DePalmer
as 3:2026mc00018
Petitioner:
Village of Romeoville, Kenneth Kroll and Scott McLaughlin
Respondent:
Keisha DePalmer
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Edward Rose Development Company, LLC v. Raoul et al
as 1:2025cv15629
Plaintiff:
Edward Rose Development Company, LLC
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul and Village of Romeoville, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Joseph Delarosa v. Village of Romeoville, et al
as 24-1715
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DELAROSA
Defendant:
VILLAGE OF ROMEOVILLE, BRANT HROMADKA and MIKE RYAN
Shaquille Prince v. Michael Michienzi, et al
as 24-1514
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE PRINCE
Defendant:
MICHAEL MICHIENZI, #357 Romeoville PD, VILLAGE OF ROMEOVILLE and TOM DORSEY
Musillami v. Village of Romeoville
as 1:2023cv12030
Plaintiff:
Santino Musillami
Defendant:
Village of Romeoville
Delarosa v. Village of Romeoville et al
as 1:2023cv07049
Plaintiff:
Joseph Delarosa
Defendant:
Village of Romeoville, Brant Hromadka and Mike Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hasan v. Knolmayer et al
as 1:2022cv06360
Plaintiff:
Zead Hasan
Defendant:
Officer Knolmayer, Sergent Galletti, Officer Kosik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Prince v. Garcia et al
as 1:2022cv05703
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Prince
Defendant:
Officer Garcia, Officer Jandura, Sgt. Berowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaquille Prince v. Sergeant Michienzi, et al
as 21-1370
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM DORSEY, VILLAGE OF ROMEOVILLE and SERGEANT MICHIENZI, #357, Romeoville PD
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAQUILLE PRINCE
Romeoville Properties, LLC v. Village Of Romeoville
as 1:2020cv00633
Plaintiff:
Romeoville Properties, LLC, d/b/a Village Place Apartments and Romeoville Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Village Of Romeoville and Village of Romeoville, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
