Cases 1 - 10 of 18
SouthState Bank, N.A. v. Vining Sparks Interest Rate Products, LLC
as 2:2023cv02698
Plaintiff:
SouthState Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Vining Sparks Interest Rate Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Pryor v. Sixty Vines Nashville, LLC
as 3:2023cv00674
Plaintiff:
Jenna Pryor
Defendant:
Sixty Vines Nashville, LLC doing business as Sixty Vines
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Norman v. Davidson Co. Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Norman
Defendant:
Davidson Co. Sheriff's Office, Pat l/n/u, Trinity Food Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vance et al v. Washington County Jail
as 1:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Roger Vance, James Swann and James Vines
Defendant:
Washington County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vine v. Byrd
as 3:2021cv00260
Respondent:
Raymond Byrd
Petitioner:
John Thomas Vine, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
The Reynolds & Reynolds Company, Inc. v. Alan Vines Automotive of Jackson, LLC
as 1:2020cv01027
Plaintiff:
The Reynolds & Reynolds Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Alan Vines Automotive of Jackson, LLC
The Reynolds & Reynolds Company, Inc. v. Alan Vines Automotive of Jackson, LLC
as 1:2020mc00003
Plaintiff:
The Reynolds & Reynolds Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Alan Vines Automotive of Jackson, LLC
Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America v. Thomas et al (RLJ2)
as 3:2018cv00137
Petitioner:
Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Daniel Thomas, Jr, Jeannie Thomas and Mario Vines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reece v. Whitley et al
as 3:2015cv00361
Plaintiff:
James R. Reece
Defendant:
L. Ray Whitley, Chris Vines, The City of Gallatin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Vines et al
as 2:2014cv02607
Plaintiff:
Warren P. Smith
Defendant:
B. Vines, J. A. Jones and Amy P. Weirich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
