Cases filed in Tennessee
Lowenstein et al v. Vaden Enterprises, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00233
Defendant: Vaden Enterprises, LLC doing business as Brand Builders Group, Rory Vaden and A. J. Vaden
Plaintiff: Liz Lowenstein and Max Lowenstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Southwestern Consulting, Inc. et al v. Vaden et al
as 3:2018cv00690
Defendant: Brand Builders Group, Rory Vaden, Amanda Johns Vaden and others
Plaintiff: Southwestern Consulting, Inc. and Southwestern/Great American, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Vaden v. Cummings Marine Service, Inc
as 2:2014cv02346
Plaintiff: Christopher Vaden
Defendant: Cummings Marine Service, Inc
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Vaden v. Dekalb Telephone Cooperative, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00105
Plaintiff: James A. Vaden
Defendant: Dekalb Telephone Cooperative, Inc. and Craig Gates
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bruso v. The County of Montgomery, Tennessee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00954
Plaintiff: Randall Eugene Bruso
Defendant: The County of Montgomery, Tennessee, Montgomery County Sheriff's Department, Pat Vaden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moussaoui et al v. Hugh M Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Company Inc 556 US129 S. Ct2252 173 L. Ed. 2d 1208, 2009 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00249
Plaintiff: Zacarias Moussaoui and Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant: Hugh M Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Company Inc 556 US129 S. Ct2252 173 L. Ed. 2d 1208, 2009, Frank Ricci, John Destefano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. et al v. Globus Medical, Inc.
as 2:2008mc00028
Plaintiff: Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Company and others
Defendant: Globus Medical, Inc.
Movant: Andrew R. Carr, Andrew R. Carr, Andrew R. Carr and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?