Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Bradbury et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv02355
Plaintiff:
William F. Bradbury, Jr., Danny E. Starner, Christopher Ford and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC), JPay/Securus Technologies, Viapath Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mirafuentes-Valdez v. Warden, FCI Elkton
as 4:2023cv01289
Petitioner:
Jesus Mirafuentes-Valdez and Warden, FCI Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Straughter v. Eddy et al
as 2:2023cv01268
Plaintiff:
Valdez J. Straughter
Defendant:
Dr Andrew Eddy, Karen Stanforth, Jenny Hildebrand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. USA
as 2:2023cv00298
Petitioner:
Diamondo Valdez Butler
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Valdez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03545
Plaintiff:
Letha M. Valdez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Valdez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03482
Plaintiff:
Letha Valdez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Resto Valdez v. City of Mentor, et al
as 1:2021cv02000
Plaintiff:
Johannie Resto Valdez
Defendant:
Mentor City of, Mentor Police Department, Donald G Swindell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valdez v. CR Bard et al
as 2:2020cv06396
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., CR Bard and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Angelo Valdez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Valdez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03630
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., CR Bard Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Raymond Valdez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Valdez v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2020cv01234
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc
Plaintiff:
Raul Valdez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
