Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Neidig v. Valley Health System
as 3:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Elaine Neidig
Defendant:
Valley Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Robinson v. Unknown Named Special Agent et al
as 3:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Robin M. Robinson
Defendant:
Unknown Named Special Agent, Michael Nordwal, US Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Strader et al v. Valley Health System et al
as 3:2020cv00216
Defendant:
Valley Health System and Winchester Medical Center
Plaintiff:
Franklin D. Strader and Tricia L. Strader
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Valley Health System
as 3:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Valley Health System
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Simms et al v. The United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv00932
Plaintiff:
Misty Simms and Caelan Jantuah
Defendant:
The United States of America, Richard Booth, Valley Health Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
E. A. Hawse Health Center et al v. Bureau for Medical Services, Department of Health and Human Resources, State of West Virginia et al
as 2:2011cv00062
Plaintiff:
E. A. Hawse Health Center , Cabin Creek Health Systems , FamilyCare HealthCenter and others
Defendant:
Bureau for Medical Services, Department of Health and Human Resources, State of West Virginia and Nancy Atkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Lanham et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01357
Plaintiff:
Vincent Lanham and Emily Lanham
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. , Valley Health Systems, Inc. and Jenifer Hadley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Valley Health System
as 3:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
Ann M. Johnson
Defendant:
Valley Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
