Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Terry Everett v. Joyce Franci
as 10-6691
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY LYNN EVERETT
Defendant - Appellee:
JOYCE FRANCIS, Warden, VALORIE RAPPOLD, A. W. Operations, KAREN LAMBRIGHT, Health Service Administrator and others
Walter White v. Joyce Francis, Warden
as 09-6318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER DUANE WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN LAMBRIGHT, Assistant Health Service Administrator, VALORIE RAPPOLD, A. W. Operations, E. MACE, Doctor, Clinical Director and others
Defendant - None:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
White v. Francis et al
as 3:2008cv00163
Plaintiff:
Walter Duane White
Defendant:
Joyce Francis, Valorie Rappold, Karen Lambright and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walter White v. Joyce Francis
as 08-7516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER DUANE WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOYCE FRANCIS, Warden, VALORIE RAPPOLD, A.W. Operations, MATT ARNOLD, Captain and others
Defendant - None:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Everett v. Francis et al
as 5:2007cv00135
Plaintiff:
Terry Lynn Everett
Defendant:
Joyce Francis, Valorie Rappold, Karen Lambright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ocegueda v. Francis et al
as 3:2007cv00128
Petitioner:
Jose Ocegueda
Respondent:
Joyce Francis, Valorie Rappold, Matthew Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
White v. United States of America et al
as 1:2007cv00032
Plaintiff:
Walter Duane White
Defendant:
Joyce Francis, Valorie Rappold, Matthew Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
White v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2007cv00015
Plaintiff:
Walter Duane White
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
