Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Johnson v. Walker
as 1:2026cv01575
Petitioner:
DuWayne Van Johnson
Respondent:
Warden H. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. GA Diagnostic and Classification Prison et al
as 1:2026cv00735
Petitioner:
Duwayne Van Johnson
Respondent:
GA Diagnostic and Classification Prison and Warden Beasley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Morales, et al.
as 26-587
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER VANNING JOHNSON
Respondent:
RAUL MORALES, Acting Warden, Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Real Party in Interest
Ivey v. City of Savannah et al
as 4:2025cv00249
Plaintiff:
Marvis McDaniel Ivey, R.N.
Defendant:
City of Savannah, Officers, Van Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Powell Water Systems, Inc.
as 25-4918
Plaintiff:
RODNEY VAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
POWELL WATER SYSTEMS, INC.
Johnson v. Smith et al
as 6:2025cv00500
Plaintiff:
Darryl Van Johnson
Defendant:
Warden M. Smith, Dr. J. Laba, Provider Johnathan Rabusa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Powell Water Systems, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00849
Defendant:
Powell Water Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rodney Van Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Long et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Gosberry, Miguel E. Tapia, Andrew McKinney and others
Defendant:
FNU Lucero, FNU Rosenbaucher, Summit Foods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burriss v. Villegas et al
as 4:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Michael Burriss
Defendant:
Anthony Villegas, Jon Ossoff, Raphel Warnock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
