Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 64
George Glickman et al v. ABB Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv09881
Defendant: Fryer-Knowles, Inc., a California Corporation, Valves and Controls US, Inc., Eaton Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Sharon Glickman and George Glickman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Daniel Seegmiller et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv06823
Defendant: BWDAC, Inc., Larsen Foundry Supply Corporation, RT Vanderbilt and others
Plaintiff: Ann Seegmiller and Daniel Seegmiller
Petitioner: John Crane, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Daniel Seegmiller et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv06755
Defendant: Blackmer Pump Company, BWDAC, Inc., Astra Flooring Company and others
Plaintiff: Ann Seegmiller and Daniel Seegmiller
Intervenor: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, Zurich American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Dutschmann v. 84 Lumber Company, a limited partnership et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv01153
Cross Defendant: Aubrey Dutschmann, BW/IP Inc., Clark-Reliance Corporation and others
Defendant: 84 Lumber Company, a limited partnership, Ace Hardware Corporation, Advance Stores Company Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Sarjeant et al v. City of Long Beach et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv01216
Defendant: ALLIED FLUID PRODUCTS CORP., formerly known as ALLIED PACKING & SUPPLY, INC., KM Industries Holding Co., Inc., formerly known as Kelly-Moore Paint Company, Inc., Owl Companies, individually and as parent, alter-ego-equitable trustee, joint venture, and as succesoor-in-interest to Smith-Amelco and Owl Constuctors, formerly known as HC. Smith Construction Co. and others
Plaintiff: James Sarjeant and Lucretia Sarjeant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gerads v. 84 Lumber Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv03672
Plaintiff: James Gerads
Defendant: 84 Lumber Company, Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Successor-by-Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
JOHNSON v. AECOM ENERGY & CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 0:2023cv61258
Plaintiff: FRENCH E. JOHNSON
Defendant: AECOM ENERGY & CONSTRUCTION, INC., Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (Successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc.) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Farris v. Avon Products, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02023
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Brenntag Specialties LLC, DCO LLC, ITT, LLC and others
Cross Defendant: Burnham LLC, Empire Comfort Systems, Inc., Paramount Global and others
Defendant: Genuine Parts Company, GG of Florida, Inc., Goulds Pumps (N.Y.) Inc. and others
Cross Claimant: Goulds Pumps LLC, Sterling Fluid Systems (USA), LLC, A.O. Smith Corporation and others
Counter Claimant: Lennox International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Keiser v. Donald McKay Smith, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00304
Plaintiff: Carolyn Keiser
Defendant: Donald McKay Smith, Inc., Red Seal Electric Company and Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
McCabe, Sr. et al v. Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv62148
Plaintiff: John R. McCabe, Sr. and Rita A. McCabe
Defendant: Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc., BASF Catalysts LLC, The Boeing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?