Cases 1 - 10 of 541
Rehart v. TDCJ
as 24-10354
Plaintiff:
Steven G. Rehart
Defendant:
TDCJ, Danny C. Diaz, Cellmate at TDCJ, OIfficer FNU Blackshire, Officer at TDCJ and others
Vasquez v. Ho et al
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Jaime Noel Vasquez
Defendant:
Peter Ho and Texas Tech Mental Health Providers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia-Perez v. Guerra
as 24-40128
Plaintiff:
Abel Garcia-Perez
Defendant:
J. E. "Eddie" Guerra, Sheriff, Jose R. Vasquez, Captain, David Flores, First Lieutenant and others
Vasquez v. USA
as 3:2024cv00440
Petitioner:
Ruben Salazar Vasquez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Vasquez v. Bexar County Adult Detention Center
as 5:2023cv01559
Plaintiff:
Francisco A. Vasquez, Jr.
Defendant:
Bexar County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Walters et al
as 5:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Darren Walters, Katrina White, Derek Hester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez-Velasquez v. Filth et al
as 6:2023cv00754
Plaintiff:
Raymond Velasquez and Raymond Vasquez-Velasquez
Defendant:
Sheriff Dana Filth and Priscilla DeLeon-Macedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deleon v. Vasquez et al
as 5:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Rocky Deleon
Defendant:
Krista Vasquez, Clayton J. Arendall, Charles B. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Mason et al
as 5:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Wanda Mason, Derek Hester, Rebecca McKibben and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. Sheriff of Dawson County
as 5:2023cv00244
Petitioner:
Zackary Lee Vasquez
Respondent:
Sheriff of Dawson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
