Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Durham v. Verizon Wireless Personal Communication LP
as 5:2015cv00403
Plaintiff:
Synnott Durham
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless Personal Communication LP
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP v. Harrison County, Mississippi
as 1:2014cv00389
Plaintiff:
Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carson v. Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP
as 6:2014cv00576
Plaintiff:
Matthew Carson
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
McLellan et al v. Verizon Wireless Personal Communications LP et al
as 5:2014cv00001
Plaintiff:
Roger McLellan and Rebecca Wade
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless Personal Communications LP d/b/a Verizon Wireless and AFNI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv12284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dolores Robinson v. Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP
as 2:2013cv02327
Plaintiff:
Dolores Robinson
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv14898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harrier v. Verizon Wireless Personal Communications LP
as 8:2012cv01588
Plaintiff:
Yancy Harrier
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless Personal Communications LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Adams v. Rural Cellular Corportion et al
as 3:2012cv00053
Plaintiff:
Samuel W. Adams
Defendant:
Rural Cellular Corportion , Verizon Business Network Services, Inc. , Verizon Network Integration Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv10766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
