Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Smith v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2014cv00865
Plaintiff:
Vickie Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Smith et al v. City of Waco et al
as 6:2013cv00179
Defendant:
City of Waco and Francisco Reyes
Plaintiff:
Tommy Smith and Vicki Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Churchill Downs Incorporated v. Trout et al
as 1:2012cv00880
Defendant:
Gary P. Aber, Susan Combs, Ronald F. Ederer and others
Plaintiff:
Churchill Downs Incorporated and Churchill Downs Technology Initiatives Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mt. Hawley Insurance Company v. The Stretford at the Cascades, L.P. et al
as 3:2011cv00973
Plaintiff:
Mt Hawley Insurance Company
Defendant:
The Stretford at the Cascades LP, Tyler-Stretford General Partner LLC, James R Light, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2007cv00369
Petitioner:
Vickie Smith
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dye v. Comstock et al
as 5:2007cv00579
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dye
Defendant:
Kenneth Bright, John Doe Currie, Vickie Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Quarterman
as 6:2007cv00211
Petitioner:
Vickie Smith
Defendant:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dye v. Comstock et al
as 2:2007cv00266
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dye
Defendant:
Mary Comstock, Jane Doe, James Fitts and others
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
