Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Brycen Daffern et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05027
Plaintiff:
Brycen Daffern, David Dahl, Susan Dailey and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Victor Flores v. Farhan Taghizadeh, et al
as 22-15510
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTOR FLORES
Defendant / Appellee:
FARHAN TAGHIZADEH, Doctor, CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, named in caption of Amended Complaint as: Correctional Health Services Corp. - Contracted Health Care Provider at Maricopa County 4th Ave. Jail, PAUL PENZONE, Maricopa County Sheriff and others
Jeffrey Peterson v. Gannett Company, Inc., et al
as 21-15057
Defendant:
SUZANNE BARR, MARIO E. DIAZ, DENNIS K. BURKE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GANNETT COMPANY, INC. and PHOENIX NEWSPAPERS, INC., DBA Arizona Republic
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY PETERSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv08185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Flores v. Taghizadeh et al
as 2:2020cv01492
Plaintiff:
Victor Flores
Defendant:
Farhan Taghizadeh, Correctional Health Services, G Gregorio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Vela, Jr. v. BOP, et al
as 20-55158
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY JONES, Case Manager, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Defendant:
FCI LOMPOC LOW HEALTH SERVICES and FCI LOMPOC LOW
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE VELA, Jr.
Peterson v. Burke et al
as 2:2020cv00106
Defendant:
Suzanne Barr, Mario E. Diaz, Marco A Lopez, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flores v. Ekren et al
as 2:2018cv00843
Plaintiff:
Victor Flores
Defendant:
Unknown Ekren and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Victor Flores-Hernandez v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-73217
Petitioner:
VICTOR FLORES-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
