Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Otero v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
Victor Otero
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Victor Otero-Pomares v. USA
as 23-10079
Petitioner / Appellant:
VICTOR OTERO-POMARES
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Otero-Pomares v. United States of America
as 8:2022cv02722
Plaintiff:
Victor Otero-Pomares
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
OTERO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv99400
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR OTERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moreno et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12010
Plaintiff:
Divina Nunez, Madeleine Netrosio, Michael E Murphy and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Otero v. MRS Baking Distribution Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv02217
Defendant:
Juan Thomas, MRS Baking Distribution Corp. and Ira Lambert
Plaintiff:
Victor Otero
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
ORTIZ v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv04020
Plaintiff:
VICTOR OTERO ORTIZ
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Victor Otero-Pomares
as 15-13110
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
VICTOR OTERO-POMARES
Samuel et al v. Hartford et al
as 3:2010cv00635
Plaintiff:
Augustus Samuel, Jr., Tonya Martin and Zakwinton Martin
Defendant:
City Of Hartford , Daryl K. Roberts , Victor Otero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Hartford et al
as 3:2007cv00823
Plaintiff:
James Cooper
Defendant:
City Of Hartford, Patrick J. Harnett, Steven Miele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
