Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Locke v. Pierce County Sheriff et al
as 3:2011cv05754
Plaintiff:
Robert Ray Locke
Defendant:
Pierce County Sheriff, Vince Goldsmith, Mary Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Pierce County Jail et al
as 3:2011cv05448
Plaintiff:
Wayne A Murphy
Defendant:
Pierce County Jail, Pierce County Jail Medical Care Center, Carlos Ortiz-Venegas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Verner v. Astrue
as 2:2010cv00371
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Vince Richard Verner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv05123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Allen et al v. Mason County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2009cv05752
Plaintiff:
Vince Allen and Jami Allen
Defendant:
Mason County Sheriff's Office, Casey Salisbury, Mason County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Koskela v. City of Renton et al
as 2:2009cv01410
Plaintiff:
Vince Koskela
Defendant:
City of Renton and American Traffic Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Verner v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv00211
Plaintiff:
Vince R Verner
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Scales v. Goldsmith et al
as 3:2008cv05480
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Scales
Defendant:
Vince Goldsmith, Mary Scott, Linda and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Masko et al
as 3:2008cv05139
Plaintiff:
James Brown
Defendant:
Rob Masko, John or Jane Doe, Vince Goldsmith and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Green v. United Steel Workers International et al
as 2:2007cv05066
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Green
Defendant:
United Steel Workers International, Hanford Atomic Metal Trades Council, AFL-CIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
