Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Bolin v. Jill L. Brown, et al
as 1:1999cv05279
Petitioner:
Paul C Bolin
Respondent:
Vincent Cullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Louis Arthur Calvin v. Vincent Cullen
as 2:2010cv00948
Petitioner:
Louis Arthur Calvin
Respondent:
Vincent Cullen
Berryman v. Wong
as 1:1995cv05309
Petitioner:
Rodney Berryman
Respondent:
Vincent Cullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Ashmus v. Ayers
as 3:1993cv00594
Petitioner:
Troy Adam Ashmus
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project
Respondent:
Robert L. Ayers, Jr. , Robert K. Wong and Vincent Cullen
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Zambrano v. Cullen
as 5:2009cv04917
Petitioner:
Enrique Zambrano
Respondent:
Robert K. Wong and Vincent Cullen
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project, Habeas Corpus Resource Center and Michael David Laurence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Wilson v. W. Nesbeth, et al
as 08-15515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
W. C. NESBETH, JOHN DOVEY, MARTIN VEAL and others
Dunkle v. Ayers
as 4:2006cv04115
Petitioner:
Jon Scott Dunkle
Respondent:
Robert L. Ayers and Vincent Cullen
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project and Habeas Corpus Resource Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coddington v. Woodford
as 2:2001cv01290
Petitioner:
Herbert James Coddington
Respondent:
Jeanne S. Woodford and Vincent Cullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rowland v. Martel, et al.
as 3:1994cv03037
Petitioner:
Guy Kevin Rowland
Respondent:
John N. Maddock, Vincent Cullen and Michael Martel
Miscellaneou:
Habeas Corpus Resource Center and California Appellate Project
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gordon v. Wong, et al
as 2:1991cv00882
Petitioner:
Patrick Bruce Gordon
Respondent:
Jeanne S. Woodford , Jill L Brown and Robert Wong
Defendant:
Vincent Cullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
