Cases 31 - 40 of 49
The Democratic Party of Virginia v. Virginia State Board of Elections et al
as 1:2013cv01218
Plaintiff:
The Democratic Party of Virginia
Defendant:
Virginia State Board of Elections , Charles Judd , Kimberly Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diane Williams v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 13-1880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIANE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and NANCY RODRIQUES, in her Individual Capacity as Secretary of the State Board of Elections
Diane Williams v. Commonwealth of VA State Bd
as 12-2485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIANE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and NANCY RODRIQUES, in her Individual Capacity as Secretary of the State Board of Elections
Libertarian Party of Virginia v. Charles Judd
as 12-1996
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA and DARRYL BONNER
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES E. JUDD, in his official capacity as member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, KIMBERLY T. BOWERS, in her official capacity as member of the Virginia State Board of Elections and DON PALMER, in his offical capacity as member of the Virginia State Board of Elections
Charles Tisdale v. Barack Obama
as 12-1124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES TISDALE
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, personally and in his official capacity as President of the United States, DON PALMER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Virginia State Board of Elections, VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Newt Gingrich v. Charles Judd
as 12-1068
Plaintiff:
RICK PERRY
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
RICK SANTORUM and JON HUNTSMAN
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEWT GINGRICH
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. JUDD, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, KIMBERLY T. BOWERS, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in her official capacity and DONALD PALMER, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity
Defendant:
PAT MULLINS, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Republican Party of Virginia and JONATHON ALDEN MOSELEY
Tisdale v. Obama et al
as 3:2012cv00036
Plaintiff:
Charles Tisdale
Defendant:
Barack H. Obama, Don Palmer, Virginia State Board of Elections and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Rick Perry v. Charles Judd
as 12-1067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICK PERRY
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
NEWT GINGRICH, RICK SANTORUM and JON HUNTSMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. JUDD, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, KIMBERLY T. BOWERS, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in her official capacity and DONALD PALMER, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity
Defendant:
PAT MULLINS, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Republican Party of Virginia and JONATHON ALDEN MOSELEY
Rick Perry v. Charles Judd
as 12-1042
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICK PERRY
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellee:
NEWT GINGRICH, RICK SANTORUM and JON HUNTSMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES E. JUDD, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, KIMBERLY T. BOWERS, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in her official capacity and DONALD PALMER, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity
Defendant:
PAT MULLINS, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Republican Party of Virginia
Rick Perry v. Charles Judd
as 12-1047
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICK PERRY
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellee:
NEWT GINGRICH, RICK SANTORUM and JON HUNTSMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES E. JUDD, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, KIMBERLY T. BOWERS, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in her official capacity and DONALD PALMER, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity
Defendant:
PAT MULLINS, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Republican Party of Virginia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
