Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Roy Perry-Bey v. Donald Trump
as 24-1110
Plaintiff: ROY L. PERRY-BEY and CARLOS A. HOWARD, F.S.P.
Defendant: DONALD J. TRUMP, VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ELECTIONS
Intervenor: REPUBLICAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA, INC.
Carlos Howard v. Donald Trump
as 24-1082
Plaintiff: CARLOS A. HOWARD, F.S.P. and ROY L. PERRY-BEY
Defendant: DONALD J. TRUMP, VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ELECTIONS
Intervenor: REPUBLICAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA, INC.
Perry-Bey et al v. Trump et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01165
Plaintiff: Roy L. Perry-Bey and Carlos A. Howard, F.S.P.
Defendant: Donald John Trump, Virginia State Board of Elections and Virginia Department of Elections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Paul Goldman v. Robert Brink
as 22-1682
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAUL GOLDMAN
Defendant / Appellee: ROBERT H. BRINK, Chairman of the State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, JAMILAH D. LECRUISE, Chairman of the State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, JOHN O'BANNON, Chairman of the State Board of Elections, in his official capacity and others
Defendant: VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of Virginia, in his official capacity
Goldman v. Brink, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00420
Plaintiff: Paul Goldman
Defendant: Christopher Piper, Virginia State Board of Elections, Jamilah D LeCruise and others
Petitioner: Jeffrey Thomas, Jr. and Joshua Stanfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Paul Goldman v. Robert Brink We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-2180
Plaintiff / Appellee: PAUL GOLDMAN
Defendant / Appellant: ROBERT H. BRINK, Chairman of the State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, JOHN O'BANNON, Vice Chair of the State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, JAMILAH D. LECRUISE, Secretary of the State Board of Elections, in her official capacity and others
Defendant: VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and RALPH NORTHAM, Governor of Virginia, in his official capacity
Phipps et al v. Virginia State Board of Elections et al
as 3:2021cv00346
Plaintiff: Timothy Clate Phipps, I, Sheila "Samm" Tittle and Constitution Party of Virginia
Defendant: Chairman of the State Board of Elections, Virginia State Board of Elections, Commissioner of the State Board of Elections and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345
League of Women Voters of Virginia et al v. Virginia State Board of Elections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2020cv00024
Defendant: Christopher E. Piper, Virginia State Board of Elections, John O'Bannon and others
Plaintiff: League of Women Voters of Virginia, Seijra Toogood, Katherine D. Crowley and others
Amicus Curiae: The Honest Elections Project, Landmark Legal Foundation and PILF
Intervenor Defendant: Republican Party of Virginia, Inc.
Petitioner: Sandy Burchett, Diane Crickenberger, Thomas N. Turner, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
New Virginia Majority Education Fund et al v. Virginia Department of Elections et al
as 3:2020cv00801
Defendant: Christopher Piper, Virginia State Board of Elections, Virginia Department of Elections and others
Plaintiff: New Virginia Majority Education Fund, Virginia Civic Engagement Table and League of Women Voters of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron Luciani v. VA State Board of Elections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1866
Defendant / Appellee: ROBERT H. BRINK, Chairman of the State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, JESSICA BOWMAN, Deputy Commissioner of the State Board of Elections, in her official capacity, JAMILAH D. LECRUISE, Secretary of the State Board of Elections, in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: AARON LUCIANI, Independent Candidate for U. S. House of Representatives

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?