Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Teasley et al v. Cobb
as 1:2022cv05030
Plaintiff:
Michelle L. Teasley and Michael Z. Teasley
Defendant:
Donna W. Cobb, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Cobbs v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv03141
Petitioner:
Michael W Cobbs
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Frederick Allman v. USDOJ, et al
as 22-35092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK L. ALLMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, UNITED STATES TRUSTEE PROGRAM and others
COBB v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00028
Petitioner:
GARY W. COBB
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Moffitt v. Cobb et al
as 2:2021cv00248
Petitioner:
Deven Moffitt
Defendant:
William W Cobb and Vermont Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Batiste v. Cobb et al
as 3:2021cv02333
Plaintiff:
Toi Batiste
Defendant:
Kevin W Cobb and Franklin Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHN W COBB TRUST v. SAFETY SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2021cv00805
Defendant:
SAFETY SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. COBB TRUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frederick Allman v. USDOJ, et al
as 21-35134
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC M. BOSSE, Esquire, Bankruptcy Professional Agent USTO District of Oregon, MICHELLE H. KERIN, Assistant US Attorney, ELIZABETH L. PERRIS, Former Judge US Bankruptcy Court District of Oregon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK L. ALLMAN
Frederick Allman v. USDOJ, et al
as 20-35839
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC M. BOSSE, Esquire, Bankruptcy Professional Agent USTO District of Oregon, MICHELLE H. KERIN, Assistant US Attorney, ELIZABETH L. PERRIS, Former Judge US Bankruptcy Court District of Oregon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK L. ALLMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
