Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Boger v. Guice et al
as 5:2016hc02289
Petitioner:
Derrick D. Boger
Respondent:
W. David Guice and George T. Solomon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PICKENS v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2016cv01358
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MICHAEL PICKENS
Defendant:
ROBERT C. LEWIS, W. DAVID GUICE, SCOTLAND COUNTY/MUNICIPALITY/LAURINBURG, NC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Perry et al
as 5:2016ct03290
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Perry
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, W. David Guice, George Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boger v. McCrory et al
as 5:2016ct03262
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Boger
Defendant:
Pat McCrory, W. David Guice, George T. Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOGER v. MCCRORY et al
as 1:2016cv01154
Petitioner:
DERRICK D. BOGER
Respondent:
PAT MCCRORY, W. DAVID GUICE and GEORGE T. SOLOMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Batman v. NC Department of Public Safety
as 5:1980cv04000
Plaintiff:
Andrew Charles Seamons
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, W. David Guice, FNU Beaver and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Seamons v. NC Department of Public Safety et al
as 3:2016cv00649
Plaintiff:
Andrew Charles Seamons
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, W. David Guice, FNU Beaver and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Test Case v. FNU Doe, et al
as 3:1975cv00001
Plaintiff:
Andrew Charles Seamons
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, W. David Guice, FNU Beaver and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Asbell et al
as 5:2016ct03146
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
Thomas E. Asbell, III, Frank L. Perry, George T. Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delgado v. White et al
as 5:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Matthew Delgado
Defendant:
Susan White, Eric Dye, T. Kosloski and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
