Cases
Terrance Henderson v. J. Harmon
as 22-6029
Plaintiff / Appellant: TERRANCE ROBERT HENDERSON
Defendant / Appellee: J. A. HARMON, Hearings Officer, Nottoway Correctional Center, CARL MANIS, Warden, Wallens State Prison and KAREN STAPLETON
Defendant: W. R. HENSLEY, Hearings Officer, Wallens Ridge State Prison, DAVID ZOOK, Warden, Sussex I State Prison, T. LEABOUGH and others
David Crawley v. George Hinkle We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-7511
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID EDWARD CRAWLEY
Defendant - Appellee: GEORGE M. HINKLE, GREGORY HOLLOWAY, W. R. HENSLEY and others
Malcolm Muhammad v. C. Stapleton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-6724
Plaintiff - Appellant: MALCOLM MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee: C. STAPLETON, W. R. HENSLEY and RANDY MATHENA
Defendant: M. STANFORD, B. RARIZEE, K. MASSEY and others
Muhammad v. Stanford et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2011cv00610
Defendant: D. Crabtree, K. Givens, W. R. Hensley and others
Plaintiff: Malcolm Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Harvey et al
as 3:2010cv00715
Plaintiff: Leonard Carter, Jr.
Defendant: A. P. Harvey, Y. M. Taylor, J. Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Bonilla v. Larry Huffman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-7586
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSE D. BONILLA
Defendant - Appellee: LARRY HUFFMAN, Regional Director, L. HAYDEN, Officer and W. R. HENSLEY, Hearing Officer
Dollison v. Hensley et al
as 7:2008cv00233
Petitioner: Willie Dollison
Respondent: W. R. Hensley and Virginia Department Of Corrections
Defendant: Warden of Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joyner v. Combs We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-7481
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENNETH BRIAN JOYNER
Defendant - Appellee: J. C. COMBS, Major, MAJOR FLEMING, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Warden and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?