Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Robinson v. Foster
as 6:2019cv06454
Plaintiff:
David W. Robinson
Defendant:
Karen Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv07029
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Konrad v. Epley
as 13-4885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Evelyn Konrad
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark Epley, Individually and in his capacity as Mayor of the Village of Southampton, Paul Robinson, Individually and as former Trustee of the Village of Southampton, Elbert W. Robinson, Jr., Individually, and in his capacity as Assistant Attorney for the Village of Southampton and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv07460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Konrad v. Epley et al
as 2:2012cv04021
Defendant:
William Brown, Mark Epley, Denis Guerin and others
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Konrad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Robinson v. Allstate
as 11-4348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David W. Robinson
Defendant - Appellee:
State of New York Department of Insurance, Charles Bardong, Director, in his Individual and Offical Capacity, County of Yates and others
Robinson v. Allstate Insurance
as 10-1721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David W. Robinson
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance, State of New York Department of Insurance and Charles Bardong
Defendant - Appellee:
County of Yates, Ronald G. Spike, Michael C. Christensen, Senior Investigator County of Yates Sheriff's Department, In His Individual and Official Capacity and others
Defendant - Cross-Appellee:
County of Yates, Ronald G. Spike and Michael C. Christensen
Robinson v. Allstate et al
as 6:2007cv06431
Plaintiff:
David W. Robinson
Defendant:
Allstate, State of New York Department of Insurance, Fraud Bureau, Charles Bardong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
