Cases 1 - 10 of 15
W.M. Barr & Company, Inc. v. Dumond, Inc.
as 2:2022cv04916
Counter Defendant:
W.M. Barr & Company, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Dumond, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127 Trademark Infringement
W.M. Barr & Company, Inc. v. Dumond, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
W.M. Barr & Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Dumond, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127 Trademark Infringement
BENHAM v. W M MARTIN TRANSPORT INC
as 3:2019cv03543
Defendant:
W.M. Martin Transport, Inc. and WM MARTIN TRANSPORT INC
Plaintiff:
Matthew Benham
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
W.M. Barr & Company, Inc. v. Miracle Shield Partnership et al
as 2:2017cv02313
Plaintiff:
W.M. Barr & Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Miracle Shield Partnership and Eugene Lucchesi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Tylor v. Eugene W.M. Ng, MD, LLC
as 1:2015cv00202
Plaintiff:
Vincent Khoury Tylor
Defendant:
Eugene W.M. Ng, MD, LLC, Eugene W.M. Ng, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Weiman Products, LLC v. W.M. Barr & Company, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01746
Plaintiff:
Weiman Products, LLC
Defendant:
W.M. Barr & Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
W.M. ENTERPRISES, INC. v. 40 E. MARKET, INC.
as 2:2014cv01506
Plaintiff:
W.M. ENTERPRISES, INC.
Defendant:
40 E. MARKET, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Homax Products, Inc. v. W.M. Barr & Company, Inc.
as 1:2011cv01762
Plaintiff:
Homax Products, Inc.
Defendant:
W.M. Barr & Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
W.M. Barr & Company, Inc. v. Rust-Oleum Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv02498
Plaintiff:
W.M. Barr & Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Rust-Oleum Corporation and John Doe Retailers 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
W.M. Barr & Company, Inc. v. Oxford & Hill Home Products, LLC.
as 2:2009cv02804
Plaintiff:
W.M. Barr & Company, Inc. and W.M. Barr & Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Oxford & Hill Home Products, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
