Cases 11 - 20 of 444
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ZF FRIEDRICHSHAFEN A.G. et al
as 1:2020cv00182
Defendant:
ZF FRIEDRICHSHAFEN AG and WABCO HOLDINGS, INC.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Transtex Inc. v. WABCO Holdings Inc.
as 20-1140
Appellee:
WABCO HOLDINGS INC. and LAYDON COMPOSITES LTD.
Appellant:
TRANSTEX INC., fka Transtex Composite Inc.
Manning v. Arconic Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02202
Defendant:
Materion Brush Inc., U.S. Minerals, Inc., Arconic Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dwayne Manning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manning v. Arconic Inc. et al
as 2:2019at01034
Defendant:
Materion Brush Inc., U.S. Minerals, Inc., Arconic Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dwayne Manning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kengchoon v. WABCO Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00816
Defendant:
Jean-Paul L. Montupet, D. Nick Reilly, Jacques Esculier and others
Plaintiff:
Supin Kengchoon
Stein v. WABCO Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00782
Defendant:
Thomas S. Gross, D. Nick Reilly, Jacques Esculier and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Kent v. WABCO Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00735
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Thomas S. Gross, D. Nick Reilly, Jacques Esculier and others
Collier v. WABCO Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00729
Defendant:
Jean-Paul L. Montupet, Dr. Juergen W. Gromer, David Nicholas Reilly and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Collier
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv14199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Transtex LLC et al v. WABCO Holdings Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv12793
Plaintiff:
Transtex LLC and Transtex Composites Inc.
Defendant:
WABCO Holdings Inc. and Laydon Composites Ltd.
Counter_claimant:
Laydon Composites Ltd. and WABCO Holdings Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Transtex Composites Inc. and Transtex LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
