Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Wade v. Lerch et al
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Shauntay Wade
Defendant:
Kyle Lerch, John Doe #1 and Kennedy Majors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gadberry et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00589
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Forest River, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Wade Gadberry and Shannon L Gadberry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pretrial Service:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WADE v. PROGRESSIVE SOUTHEASTERN INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2024cv01004
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE SOUTHEASTERN INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
APRIL WADE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
WALLACE v. GAHAN et al
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WADE WALLACE, SR.
Defendant:
JEFF GAHAN, TODD BAILEY, HATFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. Smous et al
as 3:2023cv00854
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Morton
Defendant:
Wade Smous, Antonio Rodriguez and Andrew A Krumwied
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00290
Petitioner:
WADE L. WALKER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Individuals With Disabilities Education Act
Wade v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Teresa Wade
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Individuals With Disabilities Education Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
