Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Micayla Augustyn v. Wall Township Board of Education
as 23-3208
Plaintiff:
M. A. and MICAYLA AUGUSTYN
Defendant:
WALL TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
Micayla Augustyn v. Wall Township Board of Education
as 23-3156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M. A. and MICAYLA AUGUSTYN
Defendant / Appellee:
WALL TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Camarao v. Spring Lake Police et al
as 9:2020cv82431
Defendant:
Marlboro Police, Newark Port Authority Police, Spring Lake Police and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Camarao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv05218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Testa et al v. Hoban et al
as 3:2017cv01618
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. TESTA
Defendant:
JACK HOBAN, JOSEPH ACHACOSO, THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cross_claimant:
The Township of Union, NJ , The Police Department of Union TWP., NJ and Manuel Figuieredo
Cross_defendant:
JOSEPH ACHACOSO, RAS BARAKA, Bernards Township, NJ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Testa et al v. Hoban et al
as 1:2016cv08748
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Testa
Defendant:
Jack Hoban, Joseph Achacoso, The Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1514
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv07085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
