Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Walls et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 3:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Deborah Walls and Phillip Walls
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Walls v. City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
Demetria Walls
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Mississippi, James E. Davis, Terrence Tiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reardon v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Matthew Oliver Reardon
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Lafayette County, MS, Lafayette County Chancery Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gross v. Walls et al
as 3:2021cv00345
Defendant:
Tate Reeves, Hinds County Detention Center and Doctor Unknown Walls
Plaintiff:
John Gross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walls v. Jackson County ADC et al
as 1:2021cv00149
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Walls
Defendant:
Jackson County ADC and Vital Core
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00010
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Town of Walls, Mississippi et al
as 3:2020cv00314
Defendant:
Chief Danny Bridges, Town of Walls, Mississippi, John Does 1-3 and others
Plaintiff:
Titus Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wall v. Walthall County
as 2:2020cv00017
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Walthall County
Plaintiff:
Rickie Lawayne Wall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
