Cases 1 - 10 of 892
Stano v. J.M. Smucker LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Madeline Stano
Defendant:
J.M. Smucker LLC and Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Barton v. Walmart Inc., et al.
as 24-2649
Plaintiff:
NATHEN W. BARTON
Defendant:
WALMART INC., JOHN DOE, 1-10 and SHOUJING ZHOU
Guzman v. Walmart
as 3:2024cv02353
Plaintiff:
Jaime Guzman
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
Williams et al v. Walmart Inc
as 2:2024cv01298
Plaintiff:
Latonya Williams and Zachary Williams
Defendant:
Walmart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Russell v. Walmart Inc., et al.
as 24-592
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROXANA TOWRY RUSSELL, Plaintiff Roxana Towry Russell an individual doing business as Roxy Russell Design
Defendant / Appellant:
WALMART INC., a Delaware corporation and WAL-MART.COM USA, LLC, a California Limited Liability Corporation
Leonard v. United States of America
as 24-64
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAVERNE M. LEONARD
Defendant / Appellee:
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IRVING MEDICAL CENTER, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, COLLEN RICHARD and others
Cabe v. Walmart Inc., et al.
as 23-4439
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN CECIL CABE
Defendant / Appellee:
WALMART INC., LUDLOW, Lost Prevention, individual and official capacity, SILVA, Lost Prevention, individual and official capacity and others
H.N., a minor, by and through his mother and Next Friend, Geraldine Nji v. Gerber Products Company et al
as MOW/4:23-CV-00942
Plaintiff:
H.N., a minor, by and through his mother and Next Friend, Geraldine Nji
Defendant:
Gerber Products Company, Nestle S.A., Beech-Nut Nutrition Company, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
