Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Iconic Ventures, Inc. v. Wang Dengzhong
as 3:2019cv00653
Plaintiff:
Iconic Ventures, Inc.
Defendant:
Wang Dengzhong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00144
Defendant:
Nicolas Arrendondo, Dr. Leland Beamer, RN J. Bradford and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth G. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00188
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
OmniGen Research, LLC et al v. Wang et al
as 6:2016cv00268
Defendant:
Bioshen, Yongqiang Wang and Yan Zheng
Plaintiff:
OmniGen Research, LLC and Prince Agri Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Zhao et al v. Ye et al
as 3:2014cv00157
Plaintiff:
Fei Cui and Chengwu Zhao
Defendant:
Feconn Tech Co., Ltd., Fuji (China) Holdings Co., Ltd., Uango.Com, Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Jordco, Inc. v. Pac-Dent, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01561
Plaintiff:
Jordco, Inc.
Defendant:
Pac-Dent International Inc., Pac-Dent, Inc. and Daniel Wang
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Wang v. Does
as 3:2012cv01858
Defendant:
Does
Plaintiff:
Tracy Wang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ogle v. Yates et al
as 3:2012cv00571
Defendant:
50 Jane Does, 50 John Does, Carolyn Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
David J. Ogle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
School Specialty, Inc. et al v. Kar Wang Industrial Company et al
as 3:2007cv00239
Plaintiff:
School Specialty, Inc., School Specialty, Inc., School Specialty, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kar Wang Industrial Company and Heimark International Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
