Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 38
LAWSON v. SCHERNECKE et al
as 2:2023cv04796
Plaintiff: BRANDON LAWSON
Defendant: WARDEN, FDC PHILADELPHIA, ELIZABETH A SCHERNECKE, RAEPH LAUGHINGWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lucena-Rivera v. Warden, FDC Miami
as 1:2023cv24143
Plaintiff: Raymar Lucena-Rivera
Defendant: Warden, FDC Miami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BURKS v. WARDEN, FDC PHILADELPHIA
as 1:2023cv04082
Petitioner: ELIJAH BURKS
Respondent: WARDEN, FDC PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MARTINO v. WARDEN, FDC PHILADELPHIA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02118
Petitioner: NICHOLAS KYLE MARTINO
Respondent: WARDEN, FDC PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MARTINO v. WARDEN, FDC PHILADELPHIA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02898
Petitioner: NICHOLAS KYLE MARTINO
Respondent: WARDEN, FDC PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Samuel Posa v. Warden, FDC Miami
as 23-11533
Petitioner / Appellant: SAMUEL POSA
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN, FDC MIAMI
Frantisek Pribyl v. Warden, et al
as 23-10121
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRANTISEK PRIBYL
Defendant / Appellee: WARDEN, FDC Tallahassee, PRITT, Init Manager FDC Tallahassee, D ARNOLD and others
Donte Gloster v. USA, et al
as 22-10907
Petitioner / Appellant: DONTE GLOSTER
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN, FDC MIAMI
Rocmon SandersIn re: Rocmon Sanders
as 22-1428
Petitioner: In re: ROCMON L. SANDERS
Respondent: SEAN MARLER, WARDEN, FDC and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gloster v. United States of America et al
as 9:2021cv82053
Petitioner: Donte Gloster
Respondent: United States of America and Warden FDC Miami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?