Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Anthony Marlar v. Warden, Tyger River Correction
as 08-8572
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. MARLAR
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
William Neely v. Warden
as 08-8395
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM D. NEELY
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, Tyger River Correctional Institution
Randy Rhyne v. Warden, Tyger River Correction
as 08-6876
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDY RHYNE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Jones v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 8:2008cv01958
Petitioner:
Joseph D Jones
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of, Henry McMaster and Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marlar v. Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 2:2008cv01874
Petitioner:
Anthony L Marlar
Respondent:
Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sullivan v. Ozmint et al
as 8:2008cv01088
Petitioner:
Thomas Brenore Sullivan
Respondent:
Jon Ozmint and Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McDowell v. Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 4:2008cv00752
Petitioner:
Christopher D McDowell
Respondent:
Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gaines v. State of South Carolina et al
as 9:2008cv00530
Petitioner:
Greg Gaines
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rhyne v. Warden Kershaw Correctional Institution et al
as 4:2008cv00155
Plaintiff:
Randy Rhyne
Defendant:
Warden Kershaw Correctional Institution, Agency Director, SCDC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Stevenson v. South Carolina, State of
as 2:2008cv00085
Petitioner:
Leon Stevenson
Respondent:
Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
