Cases 1 - 10 of 2,541
Glover v. Cohen
as 4:2024cv02635
Petitioner:
David Glover
Respondent:
Warden Lavern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yakubu v. Joseph
as 5:2024cv02633
Petitioner:
Nuru Yakubu
Respondent:
Warden Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jenkins v. Warden Lavern
as 0:2024cv02636
Petitioner:
Adrian Jenkins
Respondent:
Warden Lavern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beasley v. Edgefield Mailroom Clerks et al
as 4:2024cv02597
Plaintiff:
Charlton Beasley
Defendant:
Edgefield Mailroom Clerks, Edgefield Correctional Institution, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Lewis v. Warden Nance
as 8:2024cv02266
Petitioner:
Justin Jamal Lewis
Respondent:
Warden Nance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Perkins et al
as 1:2024cv01949
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Phillips
Defendant:
Sergeant Miles Perkins, Sergeant Steven Fleshman, Sergeant Nicholas Beach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Cutshaw v. Sterlin ET AL et al
as 0:2024cv01947
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wayne Cutshaw
Defendant:
Brian Sterlin ET AL, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Lt Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Thomas v. Warden Janson
as 2:2024cv01736
Petitioner:
Malcolm Oneil Thomas
Respondent:
Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brogdon v. Graham
as 5:2024cv01706
Petitioner:
Conell Brogdon
Respondent:
Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Haney v. Beckwith
as 2:2024cv01716
Petitioner:
Tron L. Haney
Respondent:
Warden Beckwith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
