Cases 1 - 10 of 16
RICHARDSON-BEY v. SHELTON et al
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
LEROY RICHARDSON-BEY
Defendant:
WARDEN M. SHELTON, SGT. WATSON, WARDEN BRAYBOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Randle et al
as 1:2014cv08717
Plaintiff:
Robert T. Williams
Defendant:
Michael P. Randle, S.A. Godinez, Warden Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Coleman et al
as 1:2014cv07729
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Crawford
Defendant:
AWP Coleman, Warden Hardy, Food Supervisor Rury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newsom v. Sheridan CC et al
as 1:2014cv04631
Plaintiff:
Edward Newsom
Defendant:
Sheridan CC, West Care, Warden Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. Wexford Health Services Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03321
Plaintiff:
Carlos Santos
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services Inc., Dr. Obaisi, Shanel Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernandez v. Pierce et al
as 1:2014cv02116
Plaintiff:
George Albert Fernandez
Defendant:
Guy Pierce, Sr., Stateville Correctional Center N.R.C., Warden Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 1:2014cv01113
Plaintiff:
Robert E Williams
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Dr Obaisi, Dr. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quiles v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 1:2013cv04263
Plaintiff:
Jesus Quiles
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, I.D.O.C. Warden Hardy, I.D.O.C. Warden Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Hardy et al
as 1:2013cv02046
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee McDonald
Defendant:
Warden Hardy, Warden Edwards and S.A. Godinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bentz v. Hardy et al
as 1:2012cv10426
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
Warden Hardy, Assistant Warden Pfister, Counselor C. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
