Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Clifton Lyles v. Donnie Stonebreaker
as 25-6828
Plaintiff:
CLIFTON DONELL LYLES
Defendant:
WARDEN DONNIE STONEBREAKER, WARDEN KENNETH SHARPE, ASSOCIATE WARDEN RICHARD CHVALA and others
David Greene, Jr. v. Pulliam
as 25-1552
Plaintiff:
DAVID GREENE, JR.
Defendant:
IGC MS. PULLIAM, MS. KRUEGER, Warden's Secretary, ADA DAVID MARTINEZ and others
Brown v. King et al
as 9:2025cv02687
Plaintiff:
Latroy Brown
Defendant:
Deloris King, Director Bryan Stirling and Warden Kenneth Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Matthew et al
as 9:2025cv00030
Defendant:
Ms. Johnson, Sgt. Benjamin Matthew and Warden Kenneth Sharp
Plaintiff:
Vernon Samuels Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greene v. John Does 1-10
as 4:2024cv05308
Defendant:
Ms. Krueger, Major Meeks, Lt. McFadden and others
Plaintiff:
David Greene, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Baird v. Sharp et al
as 0:2024cv03549
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Sharp, John Doe 1-10 and Sergeant T. Session
Plaintiff:
Dewight Sheldon Baird
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Spade v. Sharp
as 1:2024cv00866
Petitioner:
Daniel William Spade
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifton Lyles v. Governor Henry McMaster
as 23-7229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLIFTON DONELL LYLES
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, DIRECTOR BRYAN P. STIRLING, WARDEN DONNIE STONEBREAKER and others
Washington v. Sharpe
as 4:2021cv02875
Plaintiff:
Frank J. Washington and Frank Jermaine Washington
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler v. Warden Kenneth Sharp
as 9:2021cv02813
Petitioner:
Edward C Tyler
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
