Cases 1 - 7 of 7
BURSE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv01046
Plaintiff:
TYRONE A. BURSE, SR. and TYRONE BURSE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, WARDEN ORLANDO L. HARPER and PATROLMAN STEVE KESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry Holmes v. Michael Veith, et al
as 22-3263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL VEITH, WARDEN ORLANDO L. HARPER, JOSE MANUEL CARVALLO, JR. and others
Defendant:
D. CORBETT, ROBERT EVANCHICK, ROBERT FORMAN and others
BICKHAM v. HARPER et al
as 2:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH ANTHRIN BICKHAM and ISAIAH BICKHAM
Defendant:
WARDEN ORLANDO L. HARPER, DEPUTY WARDEN ADAM SMITH and MAJOR EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES et al v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY et al
as 2:2021cv01094
Plaintiff:
CARL S. JONES, JR., ANTHONY LEE, CHARLES LANTZY and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and WARDEN ORLANDO L. HARPER
Petitioner:
CODY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
COOPER v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY BUREA OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv02429
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER J. BROWN, NURSE JOHN/JANE DOE, WARDEN ORLANDO L. HARPER and others
Plaintiff:
DALE T. COOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMMONDS v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01389
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN "JOHN DOE" ZEPPO, DEPUTY WARDEN "JOHN DOE" WAINWRIGHT, MAINT. SUPERVISOR AMELIA BENNETT and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN HAMMONDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Nathan Hoye v. Allegheny County Medical Staff, et al
as 17-3770
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN ROWSHAWN HOYE
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY MEDICAL STAFF, Through Corrizon, LATOYA WARREN, of Medical. Medical Deputy in charge and WARDEN ORLANDO L. HARPER
Defendant:
KATHRYN M. KENYON, Esquire and WESTER PHYSC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
