Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Thomas Torrence v. Scott Lewis
as 21-7161
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS J. TORRENCE
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN SCOTT LEWIS
Dennis Temple v. Warden Scott Lewis
as 21-6594
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT ROBERT BLACKBURN, OFFICER KAYLA SHERVEY, PROGRAM DIRECTOR RACHEL SALTSBURG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS TEMPLE, a/k/a Dennis Maurice Temple
John Baccus v. State of South Carolina
as 20-7565
Defendant / Appellee:
K. CONRAD, PRISON KEEPER BRIAN P. STIRLING, SUSAN DUFFY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN BACCUS, a/k/a John Baccus Roosevelt
Adrian McCray v. Scott Lewis
as 20-6732
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIAN MISCELL MCCRAY, a/k/a Adrian Miscell McCray
Defendant / Appellee:
DIRECTOR BRIAN STERLING, WARDEN CARTLEDGE, WARDEN SCOTT LEWIS and others
Frederick Anderson v. Warden Scott Lewis
as 20-6311
Petitioner / Appellant:
FREDERICK VAN ANDERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN SCOTT LEWIS
Baccus v. State of South Carolina Criminal Justice System, The et al
as 9:2019cv02919
Plaintiff:
John Baccus and John Baccus Roosevelt
Defendant:
Warden Scott Lewis, Tamara Conwell, K. Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Temple v. Lewis et al
as 8:2019cv02659
Plaintiff:
Dennis Temple and Dennis Maurice Temple
Defendant:
Captain Adam Bradburn, Associate Warden Susan Duffy, Lieutenant Robert Blackburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Javan Mays v. Scott Lewis
as 19-7275
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAVAN FREDRICK MAYS, a/k/a Von Frederick Mayes
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN SCOTT LEWIS
Coley v. Lewis
as 0:2019cv02174
Petitioner:
Brice Coley
Respondent:
Warden Scott Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 8:2019cv01402
Plaintiff:
Bobby Thompson
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Associate Warden Curtis Earley, Warden Scott Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
