Cases 1 - 10 of 127
PASCHAL v. BROWN et al
as 4:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
WARREN PASCHAL, JR
Defendant:
LINTON BROWN and HOPEWELL BAPTIST CHURCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WARREN v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
MANIKA WARREN
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2617 Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
PASCHAL v. AUGUSTA STATE MEDICAL PRISON
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
WARREN PASCHAL, JR
Defendant:
AUGUSTA STATE MEDICAL PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BEY v. WILKINSON COUNTY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 5:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
ROMAN BEY
Defendant:
WILKERSON COUNTY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, TREMAYNE HALL, GRACE ANNE RODDENBERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, GREGORY DOZIER, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, AHMAD HOLT, CLAY NIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, FACILITIES DIRECTOR JACK KOON, JOHNNY SIKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
