Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 363
TILLMON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv01176
Plaintiff: ANTOINE D. TILLMON
Defendant: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00993
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
WORTHAM v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff: KRISTAL WORTHAM
Defendant: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
SNOWDEN v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2024cv00899
Plaintiff: EMMANUEL SNOWDEN
Defendant: THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, METRO TRANSIT POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER DAVIS # 892 and others
CHISLEY et al v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2024cv00824
Plaintiff: BRYCE CHISLEY and APRIL COLE
Defendant: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and DIAMOND TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC.
JACKSON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv00790
Plaintiff: MELVIN JACKSON
Defendant: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
GREEN v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv00575
Plaintiff: LOLITA GREEN
Defendant: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
SCOTT v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff: KENNETH SCOTT
Defendant: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and KAMILA HARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
BAYLOR v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv00417
Plaintiff: TAMIKA BAYLOR
Defendant: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
DAWKINS v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff: RAKIM DAWKINS
Defendant: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?