Cases 41 - 50 of 84
Hill v. Freedom Mortgage Corp
as 5:2020cv00680
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corp
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Levy v. Maryland Division Of Corrections et al
as 8:2020cv03329
Defendant:
Maryland Division Of Corrections, John Does 1-11, Jeff Nines and others
Plaintiff:
Shawnte Anne Levy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McBride v. Most et al
as 8:2020cv03002
Defendant:
Wilser, Mr. Wayne Hill, C. Gilpin and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome McBride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
David Brightwell v. J. Morgan
as 20-7461
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID BRIGHTWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
AUDREY BROWN, Administrative Officer II, Inmate Grievance Office, SGT. ABIODUN ADAMOLEKUN, COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION O. WAYNE HILL and others
Kelly v. Hill et al
as 1:2020cv02531
Defendant:
Kristofer Davis, Commissioner Wayne Hill, Lander Walley and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Darnell Kelly
Interested Party:
Division of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
US v. Dennis Hill
as 20-7289
Defendant / Appellant:
DENNIS WAYNE HILL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Harrison v. DPSCS - Secretary et al
as 8:2020cv02274
Defendant:
John Doe - DEA, CPL Luna, Robin Woolford and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Moon v. Green et al
as 1:2020cv02171
Defendant:
Mrs. Cheedi, Warden Philip J. Morgan, Dr. Krishnaswamy and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Davis v. Hogan et al
as 1:2020cv01892
Defendant:
Lawrence J. Hogan, Jr., Boyd K. Rutherford, Warden Walter West and others
Plaintiff:
Willie L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Levy v. Hogan et al
as 8:2020cv01905
Defendant:
Dr. Lynda Bonieskie, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Chief Orlando Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Shawnte Anne Levy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
