Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Franklin v. Wells Fargo & Company
as 3:2023cv00854
Plaintiff:
Beverly Franklin
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Patterson v. Wells Fargo & Company
as 3:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
LaTonya Patterson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Patterson v. Wells Fargo & Company
as 3:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
LaTonya Patterson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cunningham v. Wells Fargo N.A et al
as 3:2019cv00528
Defendant:
Nadine Mooney, David McDowell, Charles Stokes and others
Plaintiff:
Kiya Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Downey v. USA et al
as 3:2019cv00368
Defendant:
Citigroup Inc., Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Downey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McDaniel v. Bailey et al
as 3:2018cv00204
Plaintiff:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Defendant:
Michelle Feimster Bailey, Infinity Bail Bonds, LLC, Richard Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Tigress McDaniel v. Michelle Bailey
as 17-2117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIGRESS SYDNEY MCDANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE FEIMSTER BAILEY, INFINITY BAIL BONDS, LLC, RICHARD HUFFMAN, a/k/a Dick Huffman and others
McDaniel v. Bailey et al
as 3:2017cv00448
Plaintiff:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Defendant:
Michelle Feimster Bailey, Infinity Bail Bonds, LLC, Richard Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1186
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Celeste Broughton v. W. Sidney Aldridge, Jr.
as 11-1115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CELESTE G. BROUGHTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN N. MCCLAIN, JR., WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, WELLS FARGO ADVISORS, LLC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
