Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Douglas Hoglan v. A. Robinson
as 22-7265
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS A. HOGLAN
Defendant / Appellee:
A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections Operations for VDOC, K. CROWDER-AUSTIN, Regional Ombudsman, ADINA L. POGUE, Western Region Operations Manager at VDOC and others
Defendant:
MARCUS ELAM, Regional Administrator and MELISSA WELCH, Operations Support Manager for VDOC
David Meyers v. J. Ely
as 20-7235
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, J. ELY, LIEUTENANT HUGHES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. J. Ely
as 20-6628
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, J. ELY, LIEUTENANT HUGHES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Officer Baker
as 19-7844
Defendant / Appellee:
B. MORGAN, NURSE SCALF, J. ELY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. J. Ely
as 19-7850
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, J. ELY, LIEUTENANT HUGHES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Meyers v. Baker et al
as 7:2019cv00711
Defendant:
A. Rivero, J. Hounshell, A. Vanhuss and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Douglas Hoglan v. A. David Robinson
as 17-7169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS A. HOGLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections Operations for VDOC, K. CROWDER-AUSTIN, Regional Ombudsman, MARCUS ELAM, Regional Administrator and others
S. Shane Smith v. Theodis Beck
as 14-6096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
S. SHANE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
THEODIS BECK, Secretary of Correction, North Carolina Department of Corrections, sued in his individual and official capacity, BOYD BENNETT, Director of Prisons, North Carolina Department of Corrections, sued in his individual and official capacity, STEVE BAILEY, Superintendent, Western Region Director, North Carolina Department of Corrections, sued in his individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
