Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK et al v. AMERICAN GUARANTEE AND LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2021cv01011
Plaintiff:
ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK, ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK SURGERY CENTER-BETHEL PARK LLC, AHN EMERUS LLC and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN GUARANTEE AND LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Royster v. Glunt et al
as 3:2017cv01149
Plaintiff:
Michael Royster
Defendant:
Glunt, William T. Williams, Burk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piskanin v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2015cv01891
Petitioner:
Michael J. Piskanin
Respondent:
John Wetzel, Secretary and Board, Wexford Medical Contractor and successor entitites and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JACKSON v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2015cv00457
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, JOHN DOE # 1, JOHN DOE # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Wetzle et al
as 3:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
Freddie Ramirez, Jr.
Defendant:
John Wetzle, Robert M. Wolff, Christopher H. Oppman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv01359
Plaintiff:
DARYL HINES
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JOSEPH C. KORSZNIAK, MIKE WENEROWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piskanin v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2013cv02937
Plaintiff:
Michael John Piskanin, Jr.
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Gerald Casner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUSER v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2013cv01068
Plaintiff:
DARIEN HOUSER
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WETZEL, LOUIS S. FOLINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MAISANO v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2012cv01705
Plaintiff:
DALE MAISANO
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, DOCTOR GARCIA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
