Cases 1 - 10 of 363
Wilkes et al v. SouthState Bank, N.A.
as 1:2024cv01779
Plaintiff:
Todd C. Wilkes and Molly Wilkes
Defendant:
SouthState Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wilkes v. Johnson et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Randall Wilkes
Defendant:
Steve Johnson, Dana Howell and Rick Chancey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross et al v. Community Health Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv20651
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ross and Angela Schuh
Defendant:
Community Health Systems, Inc., CHSPSC, LLC., Wilkes-Barre Hospital Company, LLC doing business as Commonwealth Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
ASH v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
JABBARI KEYON ASH, SR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER and WARDEN SCOTT WILKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Javonne Wilks
as 24-10137
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAVONNE WILKS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Tracy Ward, et al v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 23-13991
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRACY WARD, DEIDRE RHODES, MICHAEL REED and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, APOTEX CORP., MICHAEL MCCANDLESS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
