Cases 1 - 10 of 336
Mundle v. Doxo, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00893
Plaintiff:
Douglas Mundle
Defendant:
Doxo, Inc., Steven Shivers and Roger Parks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Flook v. Haynes
as 2:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Roger W Flook, Jr.
Respondent:
Ron Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hasher v. City of Rochester et al
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Nathanial James Hasher
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Officer Edward Fritz, Officer Faudskar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riviera et al v. Anderson et al
as 2:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
James Riviera, Curtis Banta, Yonkman Construction, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kjell Anderson, Jay Arnold, Todd Beyreuther and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Federal Trade Commission v. Doxo Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Doxo, Inc., Steve Shivers, Roger Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Doxo, Inc., Steve Shivers and Roger Parks
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Berger et al v. General Motors LLC
as 2:2023cv01937
Plaintiff:
Mark Berger, Candace DeLeo, Lori Blanchard and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Fox v. Couch
as 2:2023cv01980
Plaintiff:
Glynndeavin Fox
Defendant:
Rogers Couch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Contract
South Lake Union Hotel LLC v. F&F Rogers Family Limited Partnership et al
as 2:2023cv01868
Plaintiff:
South Lake Union Hotel LLC
Defendant:
F&F Rogers Family Limited Partnership and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
